The following summarizes the situation in Honduras. Although there must be a more articulate counterpoint of view someplace. We are certainly not getting an articulate counterpoint from Obama, the OAS, or the UN. It would seem logical that if 2 of the branches of government support the overthrow of Zelaya than perhaps it was a legal and Constitutional "overthrow". Why is Obama is against the overthrow and meddling, something that he was unwilling to do in Iran?
http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0702/p09s03-coop.html
Hypothetical, rhetorical question: If, say in 2007, the Congress impeached Bush but Bush tried to retain power would his arrest and forced removal from office be unconstitutional and a violation of law, condemned by Obama, the UN, and the OAS?
How does a country remove it's leader?
No comments:
Post a Comment